In a recent study, the WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) glide-path file system demonstrated a lower incidence of postoperative pain compared to alternative systems. The ProGlider (PG) group exhibited elevated rates of abscess formation and analgesic consumption in contrast to the other groups. Women were found to experience greater postoperative pain than men. These study findings were published in the Journal of Endodontics.

This randomized clinical trial included a total of 78 patients with asymptomatic apical periodontitis in their maxillary and mandibular molars. These patients were then randomly allocated into three groups: control group (n = 26), PG group (n = 26), and WOGG group (n = 26). Postoperative pain levels were monitored using a numerical rating scale at specific time intervals (6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours), while the use of analgesics and abscess formation were also documented. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U, Bonferroni Dunn, Chi-square, Friedman, and Fisher exact tests.

The WOGG group demonstrated lower levels of postoperative pain at 12 and 18 hours compared to the other groups (P < .05). Women experienced higher postoperative pain scores at 6 and 24 hours in comparison to men (P < .05). Notably, the most intense postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 hours (P < .05).

It can be concluded that the WOGG glide-path file system was linked to a reduced occurrence of postoperative pain when compared to alternative systems. In contrast to the other groups, the PG group displayed higher rates of abscess formation and analgesic consumption and women experienced greater postoperative pain than men.

According to a recent study, the universal adhesive with mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) provided relief from dentin hypersensitivity, with effectiveness that is identical with or even superior to that of specific desensitizing agents. It can be utilized as an efficient in-office treatment for dentin hypersensitivity relief. This study’s findings were published in the journal, Scientific Reports.

This randomized study included 225 teeth from 39 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of a desensitizing agent with oxalate/resin polymer and a universal adhesive containing MBG for relieving dentin hypersensitivity. The assessment of efficacy was done using Schiff sensitivity score (SSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). The teeth with dentin hypersensitivity in split quadrants were treated with either MS Coat ONE or Hi-Bond Universal with MBG as the functional additive. Standardized stimulus protocols including air, cold, and acid were used for assessments at baseline, immediately after application, and at 1- and 2-week follow-ups. The primary outcome of the study was the SSS difference, whereas the VAS difference was the secondary outcome.

An instant decrease in DH was observed following exposure to air stimuli, showing a significant reduction in Group HB compared to Group MS (p = 0.017). The reduction in response to cold stimuli showed a gradual cumulative effect, consistently resulting in larger reductions in Group HB than in Group MS (p ≤ 0.037). Both groups effectively handled acidic stimuli, with no significant variances (p > 0.05). The VAS scores gradually decreased throughout the follow-up duration (p < 0.0001).

The above study showed that dentin hypersensitivity was successfully relieved by the mesoporous bioactive glass containing universal adhesive.

According to a recent study, Single Bond Universal, Xeno V+ (seventh-generation dentin bonding agents), and Bifluorid 12 exhibit equal effectiveness in reducing dentin hypersensitivity (DH), with no clear superiority observed over a one-month period. These findings underscore the potential of fluoride varnishes as a cost-effective and less technique-sensitive treatment option for DH. This study’s results were published in the BMC Oral Health.

In this parallel-group, single-center, double-blind, controlled randomized clinical trial, a total of 105 patients with DH were included. The patients were divided into three groups: one group received Single Bond Universal by 3 M ESPE, another group received Xeno-V+ by Dentsply, and the control group received fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 12 by Voco). This study assessed the Discomfort Interval Scale scores and Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale scores at baseline, immediately after the treatment, after 1 week, and after 1 month.

Treatment with all the materials demonstrated a significant reduction in discomfort and sensitivity (DIS scores p-value 0.01) observed immediately after one week and sustained over one month compared to baseline scores. None of the materials showed superiority during the one-month observation period. The study also provided insights into dental hygiene practices, indicating that the majority of participants used a toothbrush. Cold stimuli were identified as the most prevalent cause of sensitivity.

The above study demonstrated that Single Bond Universal, Xeno V+, and Bifluorid 12 are equally effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity for one month. These results underscore the potential of fluoride varnishes as a cost-effective and less technique-sensitive treatment option for DH.

A recent study has shown that the use of oral adhesive bandages were more effective compared to cotton balls and gauze, leading to better hemostatic and comfort outcomes for extraction wounds. This study’s findings were published in the journal, Clinical Oral Investigations.

This randomized controlled clinical study involved 120 patients who were randomly allocated to either the study group or the control group. The control group used gauze and cotton balls, while the study group received oral adhesive bandages for wound dressing. Comfort, hemorrhage, and healing levels were assessed at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days postoperatively. The duration of adhesion for the oral adhesive bandages was also monitored.

The oral adhesive bandages exhibited an average adhesion time of 26.6 hours. The hemostatic levels in the oral adhesive bandage group were significantly higher than those in the control group at both postoperative 1 and 24 hours. Additionally, the oral adhesive bandage group reported significantly higher comfort scores compared to the control group. Both groups demonstrated similar levels of healing and side effects, with a slightly higher mean score for wound healing observed in the oral adhesive bandage group.

The above study demonstrated that oral adhesive bandages are more effective than gauze and cotton balls, resulting in superior hemostatic and comfort outcomes for extraction wounds.