The comparison between oral arsenic plus imatinib and imatinib alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia
The comparison between oral arsenic plus imatinib and imatinib alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia, Docvidya, Medshorts, Haematology, Hematologist, Blood-related, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF), overall survival, imatinib, imatinib combined with arsenic, progression-free survival (PFS), major molecular response (MMR)
The comparison between oral arsenic plus imatinib and imatinib alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia
A recent study has shown that the use of imatinib combined with arsenic realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) as a first-line treatment for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) could potentially lead to a more effective achievement of a deeper molecular response when compared with imatinib as a standalone therapy. This study’s findings were published in the Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.
In this randomized, double-blind, multicentered phase III trial, 191 outpatients with newly diagnosed CP-CML were randomly assigned to receive oral RIF combined with imatinib (n = 96) or placebo combined with imatinib (n = 95). The primary end point of this study was the major molecular response (MMR) at six months. Secondary end points of this study included molecular response 4 (MR4), molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.
Baselines demographic data was well balanced between the two groups. The median duration of follow-up was 51 months. There was no significant difference in the rates of MMR between the combination and imatinib arms at 6 months (11.5% vs 12.6%; p = 0.828) or any other point throughout the trial. The 12-month cumulative rates of MR4.5 in the combination and imatinib arms were 20.8% and 10.5% (p = 0.043), respectively. In the core treatment with the two-year analysis, the frequency of MR4.5 was 55.6% in the combination arm compared to 38.6% (p = 0.063) in the imatinib arm. In both, combination arm and imatinib arm, the PFS (93.7% vs 95.8%; p = 0.546) and OS (92.3% vs 94.6%; p = 0.588) were similar at five years. Both groups exhibited similar safety profiles as well.
According to the above study, the combination of imatinib and RIF as a first-line therapy for CP-CML may potentially yield superior outcomes in terms of attaining a more profound molecular response, when compared to imatinib alone.
The comparison between oral arsenic plus imatinib and imatinib alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia, Docvidya, Medshorts, Haematology, Hematologist, Blood-related, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF), overall survival, imatinib, imatinib combined with arsenic, progression-free survival (PFS), major molecular response (MMR)
The comparison between oral arsenic plus imatinib and imatinib alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia
A recent study has shown that the use of imatinib combined with arsenic realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) as a first-line treatment for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) could potentially lead to a more effective achievement of a deeper molecular response when compared with imatinib as a standalone therapy. This study’s findings were published in the Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.
In this randomized, double-blind, multicentered phase III trial, 191 outpatients with newly diagnosed CP-CML were randomly assigned to receive oral RIF combined with imatinib (n = 96) or placebo combined with imatinib (n = 95). The primary end point of this study was the major molecular response (MMR) at six months. Secondary end points of this study included molecular response 4 (MR4), molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.
Baselines demographic data was well balanced between the two groups. The median duration of follow-up was 51 months. There was no significant difference in the rates of MMR between the combination and imatinib arms at 6 months (11.5% vs 12.6%; p = 0.828) or any other point throughout the trial. The 12-month cumulative rates of MR4.5 in the combination and imatinib arms were 20.8% and 10.5% (p = 0.043), respectively. In the core treatment with the two-year analysis, the frequency of MR4.5 was 55.6% in the combination arm compared to 38.6% (p = 0.063) in the imatinib arm. In both, combination arm and imatinib arm, the PFS (93.7% vs 95.8%; p = 0.546) and OS (92.3% vs 94.6%; p = 0.588) were similar at five years. Both groups exhibited similar safety profiles as well.
According to the above study, the combination of imatinib and RIF as a first-line therapy for CP-CML may potentially yield superior outcomes in terms of attaining a more profound molecular response, when compared to imatinib alone.