Why Alfoo?1
Alpha-blockers are used in the management of LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). However, they are likely to cause Ejaculatory Dysfunction (EjD).
Alfoo improves Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH with minimal effect on the Ejaculatory Function.
1. Van Moorselaar RJ et al. ALF-ONE Study Group. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily improves sexual function in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and concomitant sexual dysfunction. BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95(4):603-8.
Mode of Action of Alfuzosin
- The smooth muscle tone is regulated by alpha-adrenergic receptors.
- Blockade of these adrenoreceptors results in smooth muscle in the bladder neck and prostate to relax, further resulting in an improvement in urine flow and a reduction in symptoms of LUTS due to BPH.
- Alfuzosin is a selective antagonist of post-synaptic alpha1-adrenoreceptors, which are located in the prostate, bladder base, bladder neck, prostatic capsule, and prostatic urethra.2
- Alfuzosin’s α1-uroselectivity seems to produce less EjD compared to its counterparts that also affect vascular smooth muscle tone.3
2. Mari A et al. Alfuzosin for the medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis. Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Apr 12;13:1756287221993283. 3. Haywood E. L. Yeung, et al: Alfuzosin and Its Effect on Ejaculatory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. World J Mens Health. 2021 Apr;39(2):186-194.
What are the Side Effects?4
Postural Hypotension with or without symptoms (e.g. dizziness) may develop within a few hours following administration of Alfuzosin. As with all alpha-blockers, there is a potential for syncope.
- IFIS observed during cataract surgery in some patients on or previously treated with alpha-1 blockers.
- The risk of this event with Alfuzosin appears very low.
- Ophthalmic surgeons should be informed in advance of cataract surgery of current or past use of alpha-1-blockers as IFIS may lead to increased procedural complications.
- The Ophthalmologists should be prepared for possible modifications to their surgical technique.
IFIS: Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome
4. Product information Alfuzosin
Safety Advice4
Patients should be warned of the possible occurrence of syncope and should avoid situations where injury could result in syncope. Care should be taken when Alfuzosin is administered to patients with symptomatic Hypotension or patients who have had a hypotensive response to other medications.
Alfuzosin HCl is contraindicated:
- In patients with moderate or severe hepatic insufficiency
- When administered with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and therefore, should not be used in combination with drugs such as Ketoconazole, Itraconazole and Ritonavir.
- Pregnancy and Lactation
- Known hypersensitivity to Alfuzosin or any other ingredients of the formulation
- History of Orthostatic Hypotension
4. Product information Alfuzosin
Usage4
- Alfuzosin is used for the treatment of symptomatic BPH.
- The recommended dosage is 10 mg Alfuzosin daily to be taken immediately after the same meal each day. The tablets should not be chewed or crushed.
4. Product information Alfuzosin
Editor's Pick
Minimally Invasive BPH/LUTS Surgeries: Why Do They Attract More Attention Than Medical Management ?
Minimally Invasive BPH/LUTS Surgeries: Why Do They Attract More Attention Than Medical Management ?
Minimally invasive BPH surgeries vs. medical therapy—watch now!Minimally Invasive BPH/LUTS Surgeries: Why Do They Attract More Attention Than Medical Management ?
What Is the Level of Concords and Discords for BPH Consensus Statements Including IPSS Relevance?
What Is the Level of Concords and Discords for BPH Consensus Statements Including IPSS Relevance?
Immediate Insights: Clinician Debates on BPHWhat Is the Level of Concords and Discords for BPH Consensus Statements Including IPSS Relevance?
When’s the Right Time to Prescribe Alpha Blockers & 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Combination for BPH?
When’s the Right Time to Prescribe Alpha Blockers & 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Combination for BPH?
Unlock the clinical timing of AB + 5-ARI for BPH treatment.When’s the Right Time to Prescribe Alpha Blockers & 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Combination for BPH?
What Patient Queries About Alpha Blockers Do You Encounter While Managing BPH?
What Patient Queries About Alpha Blockers Do You Encounter While Managing BPH?
Daily vs. alternate-day dosing—patients want answers.What Patient Queries About Alpha Blockers Do You Encounter While Managing BPH?
Are All BPH/LUTS Treatments Created Equal, or Is it Time to Consider A More Personalized Approach?
Are All BPH/LUTS Treatments Created Equal, or Is it Time to Consider A More Personalized Approach?
Explore the need for personalized BPH management.Are All BPH/LUTS Treatments Created Equal, or Is it Time to Consider A More Personalized Approach?
Ejaculatory Function Improvement: The Auxiliary Benefit of Alfuzosin in BPH/LUTS Treatment
Ejaculatory Function Improvement: The Auxiliary Benefit of Alfuzosin in BPH/LUTS Treatment
Alfuzosin: Better LUTS and Ejaculatory HealthEjaculatory Function Improvement: The Auxiliary Benefit of Alfuzosin in BPH/LUTS Treatment
No More a Taboo: Why Sexual Discussions Are Crucial in BPH Care?
No More a Taboo: Why Sexual Discussions Are Crucial in BPH Care?
Supporting Sexual Health in BPH Patients: What You Need to KnowNo More a Taboo: Why Sexual Discussions Are Crucial in BPH Care?
Understanding the Clinical Features of Transurethral Enucleation With Bipolar System Using TUEB Loop for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Understanding the Clinical Features of Transurethral Enucleation With Bipolar System Using TUEB Loop for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
TUEB vs. Medication: The Best Option for Managing Large Prostate VolumesUnderstanding the Clinical Features of Transurethral Enucleation With Bipolar System Using TUEB Loop for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Treating BPH While Taking Care of Sexual Health: Twin Care by Alfuzosin
Treating BPH While Taking Care of Sexual Health: Twin Care by Alfuzosin
Ease BPH Symptoms Today with AlfuzosinTreating BPH While Taking Care of Sexual Health: Twin Care by Alfuzosin
Revolutionize Your Healthcare Practice With Digital Anweshan
Revolutionize Your Healthcare Practice With Digital Anweshan
Transform Your Practice Now with Digital Anweshan.Comparison of low- and high-power thulium laser enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostates over 80 g
Comparison of low- and high-power thulium laser enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostates over 80 g
A recent study demonstrated that low-power YAG VapoEnucleation (ThuVEP) is safe, feasible, and effective, showing results similar to high-power ThuVEP in managing benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The results of this study were published in the World Journal of Urology.
An analysis was carried out on 80 patients with symptomatic BPO and prostatic enlargement exceeding 80 ml. The patients were randomly split into two groups, each consisting of 40 patients. Group A underwent treatment with low-power ThuVEP, while Group B received high-power ThuVEP. Preoperative and early postoperative evaluations were conducted for all patients, with a follow-up analysis of 12 months. Complications were recorded and categorized based on the modified Clavien classification system.
The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 68 (± 6.1) years. The mean prostate volume was 112 (± 20.1) cc. The groups exhibited no significant variations (p value = 0.457). The average operative time for Group A was 88.4 ± 11.79 minutes, and for Group B it was 93.4 ± 16.34 minutes. Group A had a mean enucleation time of 59.68 ± 7.24 minutes, whereas Group B had a mean enucleation time of 63.13 ± 10.75 minutes. Quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume, and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) all showed significant improvement after treatment and were not significantly different between those treated with different energies. Complications were rare and showed no variation between the two groups.
The above study indicates that low-power ThuVEP is safe, feasible, and effective, demonstrating outcomes comparable with high-power ThuVEP in the management of BPO.
Comparison of low- and high-power thulium laser enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostates over 80 g
Comparison of low- and high-power thulium laser enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostates over 80 g
A recent study demonstrated that low-power YAG VapoEnucleation (ThuVEP) is safe, feasible, and effective, showing results similar to high-power ThuVEP in managing benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The results of this study were published in the World Journal of Urology.
An analysis was carried out on 80 patients with symptomatic BPO and prostatic enlargement exceeding 80 ml. The patients were randomly split into two groups, each consisting of 40 patients. Group A underwent treatment with low-power ThuVEP, while Group B received high-power ThuVEP. Preoperative and early postoperative evaluations were conducted for all patients, with a follow-up analysis of 12 months. Complications were recorded and categorized based on the modified Clavien classification system.
The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 68 (± 6.1) years. The mean prostate volume was 112 (± 20.1) cc. The groups exhibited no significant variations (p value = 0.457). The average operative time for Group A was 88.4 ± 11.79 minutes, and for Group B it was 93.4 ± 16.34 minutes. Group A had a mean enucleation time of 59.68 ± 7.24 minutes, whereas Group B had a mean enucleation time of 63.13 ± 10.75 minutes. Quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume, and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) all showed significant improvement after treatment and were not significantly different between those treated with different energies. Complications were rare and showed no variation between the two groups.
The above study indicates that low-power ThuVEP is safe, feasible, and effective, demonstrating outcomes comparable with high-power ThuVEP in the management of BPO.
Efficacy and safety of Vibegron in managing residual symptoms of an overactive bladder following laser vaporization of the prostate
Efficacy and safety of Vibegron in managing residual symptoms of an overactive bladder following laser vaporization of the prostate
According to a recent study, the administration of fifty mg of Vibegron once daily for twelve weeks exhibited significant improvement in bladder storage symptoms related to overactive bladder (OAB) following laser vaporization of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia when compared to the untreated follow-up period. The findings of this study were published in the journal, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.Split into two groups: one group received Vibegron 50 mg once daily, while the other group had no treatment and were only followed up for 12 weeks.The median age (interquartile range) was 75.5 (72.5-78.5) years for the Vibegron group, while it was 76.5 (71.0-81.0) years for the control group. At twelve weeks post-randomization, the intergroup difference in the mean change (95% CI) in twenty-four hour urinary frequency was -3.66 (-4.99, -2.33) with a significant decrease in the Vibegron group. Significant improvements were noted in the International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and IPSS storage score for the Vibegron group. Additionally, in the Vibegron group the voided volume per micturition increased.
Therefore, the treatment with fifty mg of Vibegron once a day for a duration of twelve weeks resulted in notable enhancement in bladder storage symptoms associated with overactive OAB after laser vaporization of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia when compared to the untreated follow-up period.
Efficacy and safety of Vibegron in managing residual symptoms of an overactive bladder following laser vaporization of the prostate
Efficacy and safety of Vibegron in managing residual symptoms of an overactive bladder following laser vaporization of the prostate
According to a recent study, the administration of fifty mg of Vibegron once daily for twelve weeks exhibited significant improvement in bladder storage symptoms related to overactive bladder (OAB) following laser vaporization of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia when compared to the untreated follow-up period. The findings of this study were published in the journal, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.Split into two groups: one group received Vibegron 50 mg once daily, while the other group had no treatment and were only followed up for 12 weeks.The median age (interquartile range) was 75.5 (72.5-78.5) years for the Vibegron group, while it was 76.5 (71.0-81.0) years for the control group. At twelve weeks post-randomization, the intergroup difference in the mean change (95% CI) in twenty-four hour urinary frequency was -3.66 (-4.99, -2.33) with a significant decrease in the Vibegron group. Significant improvements were noted in the International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and IPSS storage score for the Vibegron group. Additionally, in the Vibegron group the voided volume per micturition increased.
Therefore, the treatment with fifty mg of Vibegron once a day for a duration of twelve weeks resulted in notable enhancement in bladder storage symptoms associated with overactive OAB after laser vaporization of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia when compared to the untreated follow-up period.
The use of prostatic urethral lift to effectively alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms while preserving sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
The use of prostatic urethral lift to effectively alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms while preserving sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
A recent study demonstrated that prostatic urethral lift (PUL) offers benefits compared to control interventions, showing promising potential for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study findings were published in the journal, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia.
Cochrane CENTRAL, EBSCO, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched using relevant terms related to PUL and BPH. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 2013 to 2023 were considered, following the PRISMA checklist. The assessment focused on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), sexual function, quality of life, and adverse events within 3 months. Post-treatment mean values were compared with Sham (controls), and the progress from baseline to post-treatment follow-up duration was considered. The statistical analysis and assessment of bias risk were carried out with Review Manager 5.4.1, showcasing findings in terms of mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR).
A meta-analysis involving 378 confirmed BPH patients across 7 RCTs and utilizing a Random Effects Model revealed significant improvements in the PUL arm. These improvements included international prostate symptom score (IPSS) (MD 5.51, p<0.0001), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) (MD 2.13, p=0.0001), IPSS-QoL (MD 1.50, p<0.0001), and BPH Impact Index (BPHII) (MD 2.14, p=0.0001) . There was no significant increase in adverse events (RR 1.51; p=0.50). Additionally, positive outcomes were observed in post-void residual measurements and sexual function variables when post-treatment values were compared to baseline.
The above study showed that PUL provides benefits when compared to control treatments, displaying promising potential for the management of BPH.
The use of prostatic urethral lift to effectively alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms while preserving sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
The use of prostatic urethral lift to effectively alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms while preserving sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
A recent study demonstrated that prostatic urethral lift (PUL) offers benefits compared to control interventions, showing promising potential for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study findings were published in the journal, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia.
Cochrane CENTRAL, EBSCO, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched using relevant terms related to PUL and BPH. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 2013 to 2023 were considered, following the PRISMA checklist. The assessment focused on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), sexual function, quality of life, and adverse events within 3 months. Post-treatment mean values were compared with Sham (controls), and the progress from baseline to post-treatment follow-up duration was considered. The statistical analysis and assessment of bias risk were carried out with Review Manager 5.4.1, showcasing findings in terms of mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR).
A meta-analysis involving 378 confirmed BPH patients across 7 RCTs and utilizing a Random Effects Model revealed significant improvements in the PUL arm. These improvements included international prostate symptom score (IPSS) (MD 5.51, p<0.0001), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) (MD 2.13, p=0.0001), IPSS-QoL (MD 1.50, p<0.0001), and BPH Impact Index (BPHII) (MD 2.14, p=0.0001) . There was no significant increase in adverse events (RR 1.51; p=0.50). Additionally, positive outcomes were observed in post-void residual measurements and sexual function variables when post-treatment values were compared to baseline.
The above study showed that PUL provides benefits when compared to control treatments, displaying promising potential for the management of BPH.
Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg versus 0.8 mg in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement
Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg versus 0.8 mg in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement
According to a new study, Tamsulosin 0.8 mg has demonstrated superior efficacy in managing lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement compared to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, and it is well tolerated by patients. This study was published in the journal, International Urology and Nephrology.
In this study, ninety-three patients who met the criteria were allocated randomly into two groups: Group A, who received Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day, and Group B, who received Tamsulosin 0.8 mg/day. The post void residual urine volume, international prostate symptom score and maximum flow rate of urine were measured before and after 4 weeks of treatment
Both study groups exhibited a notable decline in storage sub-score but only Group B demonstrated a significant decrease in frequency (P < 0.001).Tamsulosin 0.8 mg was found to be superior to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in terms of voiding sub-score, except for straining (P = 0.325). The total international prostate symptom score exhibited a significant improvement in Group B when compared to Group A (P < 0.001). Additionally, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were notably improved in Group B when compared to Group A (P < 0.001).
Thus, it can be concluded that Tamsulosin 0.8 mg is more effective than Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in addressing lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement, and patients tolerate it well.
Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg versus 0.8 mg in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement
Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg versus 0.8 mg in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement
According to a new study, Tamsulosin 0.8 mg has demonstrated superior efficacy in managing lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement compared to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, and it is well tolerated by patients. This study was published in the journal, International Urology and Nephrology.
In this study, ninety-three patients who met the criteria were allocated randomly into two groups: Group A, who received Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day, and Group B, who received Tamsulosin 0.8 mg/day. The post void residual urine volume, international prostate symptom score and maximum flow rate of urine were measured before and after 4 weeks of treatment
Both study groups exhibited a notable decline in storage sub-score but only Group B demonstrated a significant decrease in frequency (P < 0.001).Tamsulosin 0.8 mg was found to be superior to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in terms of voiding sub-score, except for straining (P = 0.325). The total international prostate symptom score exhibited a significant improvement in Group B when compared to Group A (P < 0.001). Additionally, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were notably improved in Group B when compared to Group A (P < 0.001).
Thus, it can be concluded that Tamsulosin 0.8 mg is more effective than Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in addressing lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement, and patients tolerate it well.
Patients who receive a double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent experience a reduction in symptoms associated with the stent
Patients who receive a double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent experience a reduction in symptoms associated with the stent
According to a recent study, patients who were treated with double J (DJ) substitution utilizing a pigtail suture stent (PSS) subsequent to the ureteroscopy (URS) procedure experienced a significant alleviation of stent-related symptoms (SRS). Urologists could consider the placement of PSS after URS in patients who have been pre-stented to mitigate the effects of SRS. The results of the study were documented in the World Journal of Urology.
This study enrolled 93 patients with DJ stents undergoing URS for stone management. The Ureteral Symptom Score Questionnaire (USSQ) was submitted at three distinct time points: two weeks after the DJ stent insertion, two weeks following the PSS placement, and four weeks after the PSS removal [baseline]. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare the Urinary Symptom Index Score and the prevalence of pain in patients two weeks after the DJ and PSS procedures. The secondary endpoints included comparing various USSQ scores and single responses two weeks after the DJ and PSS placements, as well as evaluating the USSQ scores for both DJ and PSS in relation to the baseline measurements.
The results indicated a significant improvement in the Urinary Symptom Index Score after two weeks (p value < 0.001), along with a notable difference in the percentage of patients experiencing pain (60.2% for PSS compared to 88.2% for DJ, p value < 0.001), both of which favored PSS. The two-week scores revealed significant enhancements with PSS relative to DJ in various indices: Pain Index (p value < 0.001), General Health Index (p value < 0.001), VAS (p value < 0.001), and Work Performance Index (p value < 0.001). All urinary symptoms were significantly alleviated with PSS, including renal pain during urination and pain affecting quality of life. The Pain Index Score (p value = 0.622) and VAS (p value = 0.169) were similar to baseline with PSS, differing with the results observed with DJ.
Therefore, patients who underwent DJ substitution with PSS after URS demonstrated a significant decrease in SRS. Urologists could consider PSS following URS for patients who have previously been pre-stented to alleviate stent-related symptoms.
Patients who receive a double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent experience a reduction in symptoms associated with the stent
Patients who receive a double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent experience a reduction in symptoms associated with the stent
According to a recent study, patients who were treated with double J (DJ) substitution utilizing a pigtail suture stent (PSS) subsequent to the ureteroscopy (URS) procedure experienced a significant alleviation of stent-related symptoms (SRS). Urologists could consider the placement of PSS after URS in patients who have been pre-stented to mitigate the effects of SRS. The results of the study were documented in the World Journal of Urology.
This study enrolled 93 patients with DJ stents undergoing URS for stone management. The Ureteral Symptom Score Questionnaire (USSQ) was submitted at three distinct time points: two weeks after the DJ stent insertion, two weeks following the PSS placement, and four weeks after the PSS removal [baseline]. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare the Urinary Symptom Index Score and the prevalence of pain in patients two weeks after the DJ and PSS procedures. The secondary endpoints included comparing various USSQ scores and single responses two weeks after the DJ and PSS placements, as well as evaluating the USSQ scores for both DJ and PSS in relation to the baseline measurements.
The results indicated a significant improvement in the Urinary Symptom Index Score after two weeks (p value < 0.001), along with a notable difference in the percentage of patients experiencing pain (60.2% for PSS compared to 88.2% for DJ, p value < 0.001), both of which favored PSS. The two-week scores revealed significant enhancements with PSS relative to DJ in various indices: Pain Index (p value < 0.001), General Health Index (p value < 0.001), VAS (p value < 0.001), and Work Performance Index (p value < 0.001). All urinary symptoms were significantly alleviated with PSS, including renal pain during urination and pain affecting quality of life. The Pain Index Score (p value = 0.622) and VAS (p value = 0.169) were similar to baseline with PSS, differing with the results observed with DJ.
Therefore, patients who underwent DJ substitution with PSS after URS demonstrated a significant decrease in SRS. Urologists could consider PSS following URS for patients who have previously been pre-stented to alleviate stent-related symptoms.
How would you rate this Medshorts
Thank you !
Your rating has been recorded.
-
-
LUTS due to BPH… + 1LUTS due to BPH… , Urology
Algorithmic Approach to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
-
Videos Speakers
Alfoo-Improved Pharmacokinetics
Alfoo-Improved Pharmacokinetics, Alfoo, Docvidya, Urology, Urologist, Brands, Alfuzosin, LUTS, BPH, Lower urinary tract symptoms-LUTS, Benign prostatic hyperplasia-BPH
Below fields are needed for webinar purpose.